Bullet Jets in the Hubble Deep North

The universe reveals many jets ejecting long streams of stars and gas. In nearby galaxies, we see dense knots (like beads on a necklace) in these jets. Here is a NASA (Hubble) picture of the M87 jet as it moves out of the core of a M-87 jet in Virgonearby elliptical galaxy. Evidently jets are NOT like a fire hose, shooting out gas and dust in a continuous stream. The knots are like machine gun bullets, with approximately equal spacing between the bullets. The jets do not condense into bullets or break into pieces after being fired. They were formed and ejected as bullets.

When we observe the earliest universe, we see equally spaced chains of galaxies. At closer ranges, we observe that many primordial galaxies are surrounded by distinct, equally-spaced globs - packed with stars. At even closer ranges, we observe the stars coming out, spreading out, as billions of galaxies grew into huge, local growth spirals.

Here are three galaxies from the Hubble Deep Field North. The HDFN was a long exposure of a seemingly dark patch of sky. We see the galaxies in the HDFN exactly as they existed long ago.

In the first frame of this Chain galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field Northfilm strip, we see HDFN galaxy #472 - a bipolar stream of globular bullets coming out of a galaxy core. The light from this distant galaxy shines at 47% of the frequencies of local, modern atoms.

In the second frame, HDFN # 909 has little knots packed with stars bending around in the beginning stages of a spiral galaxy. The light from this galaxy shines at 29% of the frequencies of local, modern atoms.

In the third frame, we see HDFN galaxy #225. Its two arms are made up of little knots packed with stars that arch around the barred core of a primordial spiral. The light from this galaxy shines at 75 % of the frequencies of local, modern atoms.

All atomic clocks always accelerate their clock frequencies throughout the ages. We can confirm this even locally with the Pioneer Anomaly. (See statement about Pioneer Anomaly here). The orbits visibly accelerate outward even as the atomic clocks also accelerate in billions of galaxies at many ranges. This is clear, visible evidence for relational changes in all matter.

How do astronomers explain these jets? They speculate that an invisible black hole, so dense even light can't escape, is spinning so fast that it shoots out jets! Allegedly the jets break into clumps by the action of the intense magnetic field that surrounds the invisible hole in space. Scientists explain the visible evidence for accelerating atomic clocks by imagining that the vacuum of space-time is expanding. Allegedly the vacuum expansion changes the frequencies of all distant light, so that what we see is not what was transmitted into the void. Yet no one has ever detected any space-time, invisible holes or expanding vacuums. Scientists use invisible things to explain away the visible evidence for real changes in all matter - throughout cosmic history. The scientific universe is 99% invisible to preserve the scientific dogma that the properties of matter are not emergent.

How can we be sure that the properties of matter always change relationally? We can see in the primordial sky, at many ranges, the history of how the galaxies formed. Billions of galaxies spread out from naked objects packed with stars to huge, diffuse, growth spirals. We observe that the properties of all matter always change relationally. Indeed, we can see in billions of galaxies that no perpetual motion atoms exist. Yet modern scientists contrived their units of measuring, their methods and their mathematics with their atomic perpetual motion assumption. Indeed, it is with their atomic perpetual motion assumption that scientists contrived their versions of earth and cosmic histories.

What we see in the universe is evidence for biblical physics. Biblical physics is extremely simple. It uses no complex mathematics or symbolical ways of measuring. The law of biblical physics is that the creation is in bondage to phthora - fundamental change. We confirm biblical physics with sight. Every bit of matter in the whole universe is observed to change its properties throughout cosmic history. Biblical physics allows one to accept the visible history of the universe, instead of the speculative, scientific universe that is 99% invisible. What we see, in all parts of the spectrum, is a biblical cosmic history - as described by the Hebrew words and verbs in the Old Testament. Of course what is visible violates the Western concept of invariant time, clock-like orbits, immutable matter, the scientific laws of physics and the scientific ways of measuring.

How could the whole scientific structure fail at once? Scientists are taking an enormously risk by building huge telescopes that can see the creation in finner detail. They have already glimpsed the creation of galaxies but refuse to believe their eyes. In fact, it is because no scientist is allowed to believe what is plainly visible, that their universe is 99% invisible. They contrived all the invisible things to protect their historical first principle. The scientific first principle was invented out of thin air by a pagan Greek, more than 2300 years ago. He wrote that we must assume that the properties of matter are fixed. If the first principle of science proves false, then the whole structure will catastrophically collapse.  This year two space telescopes are due to be commissioned for visually recording the beginning of the universe. The demise of science is coming soon. Stay tuned.

The Bible even predicts that in the last days false teachers will come saying "panta outos diameni - all things remain the same in being".  The Bible predicts that at some point God will make foolish the wisdom of this age. Carefully consider the simplicity of biblical physics and the simplicity of a biblical cosmic history. A biblical cosmic history is confirmed with sight, whereas, a scientific universe is filled with invisible magic and never detected vacuous processes.

Think about it.

Return to godsriddle home page

This document is under a Creative Commons License by Victor McAllister. What does that mean?
Last modified February 12, 2009