Einstien
Relativity versus Biblical Physics
The Gravity Probe B satellite measured the precessions of four
spherical gyros with respect to the star IM Pegasi. Precession changes
the spin axis of ordinary gyros ninety degrees from an applied force in
the direction of rotation. Spherical gyros precess because they
are not perfectly balanced. (The earth is not a perfect sphere
nor is it internally homogeneous so its spin axis slowly precesses
through the background stars.) Like the earth, a spherical gyro
has no bearing. It is levitated in an electric field. The
GPB gyros were ground out of pure quartz. They are almost perfect
speres before spin up. However, when one spins up a bearingless
sphere it naturally wobbles like a poorly thrown football (polhode
motion). The large gyro wobbles and internal drifts must be
subtracted out mathematically to leave minuscule motions that might
correlate with general relativity predictions.
Einstein believed that gravity does not depend on the properties only
of matter. He hypothesized that matter alters the properties of
space-time and disturbances in space-time are equivalent to
gravity. The purpose of the experiment was to measure two effects
predicted by Einstein’s general relativity. The first is the
geodetic effect. Supposedly, the earth’s mass is warping
space-time which alters the motion of passing objects. As the
satellite moves over mountains and across seas, the geodetic effect
varies because the height and composition of the earth below the
satellite changes. A second effect is called frame
dragging. According to Einstein, as the earth rotates, it should
drag space-time around. After years of analysis, scientists were
able to mathematically account for the vast majority of gyro drifts by
calculating satellite forces, gyro polhode motions, scale factors and
misalignments. Some of the remaining milli-arcseconds-per-year
precession was attributed to the geodetic effect to within 1.5% of
relativity’s predictions. Frame dragging is predicted to act
ninety degrees to the geodetic effect. NASA recently denied
additional funding to massage the GPB results to precisely affirm frame
dragging. Frame dragging is such a tiny effect that it is
extremely difficult to verify.
Almost 2,000 years ago, Peter predicted the first thing to know about
the last day thinkers. He predicted that they will say, “all
things diameni - all things remain the same in being.” Aristotle was
the first to suggest that the properties of matter are fixed. He
said it was absurd to make the fact that everything changes the basis
of our search for truth. Fifteen hundred years later the Christian
scholastics laid the foundation for scientific measuring and reasoning
on Aristotle’s assumption. Einstein’s ideas about space-time,
time, mass, energy and gravity rely on Aristotle’s assumption that
matter is not inherently changing. An object accelerated to close
to the speed of light impacts a target as though it were larger and
heavier than it was before it was accelerated. Einstein: “It is
not good to introduce the concept of the mass of a moving body M=gm for
which no clear definition can be given. It is better to introduce no
other mass concept than the 'rest mass' m.” * No one ever isolated any
time, energy, mass or ‘rest mass’ apart from mathematically applying
Aristotle’s assumption. The modern version of this assumption is
that atoms are perpetual motion machines, always moving but never
changing their form, motions and frequencies. This assumption is
implicit in the operational definitions of matter and time and the
experimental system. Einstein’s corrected his perpetual motion
atoms with relativity.
Biblical physics is completely unlike scientific physics.
Biblical physics uses no difficult mathematics or symbolic ways of
measuring. The foundation for biblical physics is the principle
that the whole creation is in bondage to phthora, fundamentally
change. We see with sight that the properties of matter are
always emerging because we can visually compare the internal dithering
of primordial atoms with modern atoms. No perpetual motion atoms
gleam from billions of distant galaxies. Biblical physics is also
affirmed when we compare the shapes of primordial galaxies with local
ones. We see that primordial galaxies were like tiny seeds, often
seen in equally spaced chains. Closer, larger galaxies are
surrounded with dense globs of stars in equally spaced chains. At
many ranges we observe that the globs accelerate out, spread out, take
up more volume, move out and spiral out. Billions of galaxies
grew into huge, diffuse growth spirals as the properties of matter
visibly and continually changes. Every clock, atomic and orbital,
visibly accelerates when we observe the visible history of the
universe. What we see with sight fits the Hebrew words of the
Bible like a glove.
Countless atoms in the universe are observed to change relationally as
they age. Relational changes have no independent variables
because everything changes in unison, changes together. You
cannot precisely define time, mass or energy with biblical
physics. However, relational changes can account for the visible
universe in simple ways unlike scientific physics.
Einstein’s system results in an invisible universe crammed full of
undetectable matter and magical vacuum processes. Dark energy has
never been detected in a lab or with any experiment. There is
less direct, visible evidence for demons than for dark energy. It
supposedly causes the vacuum of space to produce a negative gravity
pressure that accelerates distant galaxies. The energy source for
dark energy is the vacuum that continues to supply it with more energy
from the vacuum of nothingness. A scientific cosmic history has
more absurd myths and just-so stories than the myths of the planet
gods. All the myths were invented to protect their creed that the
properties of matter are not continually changing. Even
experiments looking for the geodetic effects and frame dragging depend
on the assumption that the properties of matter are not changing
together, in an orderly manner.
* In a letter from Einstein to Lincoln Barnett in 1948.
The
LAGEOS satellites are heavy brass spheres covered with
retro-reflectors. Pulsed lasers shone at the satellites are
reflected back to the source. Time delays are used to estimate
the distance to the satellites. Frame dragging
should precess the LAGEOS birds about 31 milli-arcseconds per
year. However, other effects precess the birds millions of times
that much. The process of detecting frame dragging is like
mathematically subtracting the haystack to detect an invisible
needle. Several studies claim to have detected frame dragging
using the LAGEOS birds but the accuracy is controversial. The
question the reader should consider is, are the basic assumptions used
in such experiments valid?
Copyright June 2008 by Victor McAllister
Last edition June 13, 2008
Return
to Main Page
